Family law specialist Jennifer Kotilaine considers the recent case of Re M  (Special Guardianship Order: Leave to apply to discharge) EWCA Civ 442, in which she is acting, and the clarification it brings to the test for permission to apply to discharge SGOs.
Jennifer works principally in the field of public family law, representing parents, children and local authorities in complex care proceedings. She has experience of representing parents and children with mental health issues and learning difficulties. Her public law cases have covered areas such as neglect, domestic violence, substance abuse, sexual abuse, non-accidental injury, female genital mutilation, factitious illness and children with life limiting conditions.
Many of her public law proceedings include an international dimension. She also routinely advises local authorities on their duties to unaccompanied asylum seeking and refugee children.
Jennifer is often instructed in private family matters, some of which have included honour based violence and modern slavery. She has regular instructions in matters of international family law, including applications to remove children permanently from the jurisdiction, internal relocation, and child abduction proceedings in the High Court.
She also accepts instructions on Family Law Act matters.
Court of Protection
Jennifer practices in the Court of Protection. She represents local authorities in cases relating to capacity, deprivation of liberty, and welfare (including residence and contact). A member of the Court of Protection ad hoc rules committee, she is well-versed in the details of the Court’s rules and how they are being developed and has provided training on changes to the rules to local authorities and other solicitors.
She also advises local authorities on the question of ordinary residence for the purpose of assigning responsibility for the care of vulnerable adults and has published on this topic.
Jennifer is a family mediator (Resolution).
Talk about a Revolution: The Internet and Children Proceedings, Family Law Week 17.08.17
‘Archer v Titchener: What would a Family Court Decide?’ Family Law Week, 21.09.16
‘Duties of Local Authorities to Unaccompanied Migrant Children,’ Family Law Week, 01.09.16
‘Swings and Roundabouts’, NLJ 2015 13 Nov 2015
‘Reviewing Findings of Fact in Care Proceedings’, Family Law Week, 28.07.14
‘There’s No Place Like Home’, NLJ 11 Jul 2014
‘Children and Families Act 2014: A Guide for Public Children Lawyers’, Family Law Week, 17.04.14
- Re M (Special Guardianship Order: Leave to Apply to Discharge)  EWCA Civ 442
This case clarifies the test to be used when applying for leave to discharge a Special Guardianship Order. There are two stages to this test. First, there must be a significant change of circumstances. If this test is met, then the the court must evaluate the prospects of success of the application in the context of the effect on the child’s welfare of the application being heard or not heard. However the child’s welfare is not the paramount consideration. The degree of any change in circumstances is likely to linked to prospects of success. The greater the prospects of success, the more likely it is that leave will be granted.
- Re T (Early permanence or kinship carers)  EWFC B43
- WSCC v H & Ors (Children) (Care proceedings: Brain Injury), Re  EWHC 2439 (Fam) (led by Gemma Taylor)
When is a final order not the last word?15th Jul 2021
Talk about a revolution: the internet and children proceedings17th Aug 2017
3PB family barrister, Jennifer Kotilaine reflects on the various ways in which the application of children law has adapted to the internet and social media and on the further adaptations that may lie ahead.
‘Jennifer is diligent and thorough in the cases she deals with. She approaches each matter with sensitivity and will put forward her client’s case fearlessly and to the best of her ability, even against the odds.’
‘Jennifer is someone I turn to in particular to assist with cases in which we represent older children. She manages them beautifully and sensitively, cares about the outcome of their cases and invests herself fully in their representation.’
‘I have been particularly impressed by Jennifer's ability to deal with care cases with a foreign element. She understands the many problems of assessing family abroad and navigates the issues with great skill.’
‘Jennifer has a kind and empathetic manner and will make any client feel well supported and that she cares about getting the best outcome for them.’
‘Jennifer’s positive, calm and helpful approach and expertise in this very complex matter were invaluable to this case and it was a great pleasure working with her. She came highly recommended and I will certainly look forward to instructing her in the future and recommending her to colleagues.’
‘Jennifer was extremely helpful to the social work team and identified solutions in a very enabling and supportive manner. The social workers really felt that they were all part of one team.’
‘Her very clear, concise and frank advice on the legality of our policy [in relation to Special Guardian allowances] has been escalated to the highest level. We will now be redrafting our policy accordingly.’
‘Your piece [on local authority duties to unaccompanied migrant children] was immensely informative and easy to follow and beautifully written. Thank you-- though I am very perturbed about that massive glistening iceberg that is in our path that you have just illuminated.’
- BA/BMus (High Honors), Oberlin College & Conservatory, USA
- PhD in Music, Harvard University USA
- MA (Jurisprudence), University of Oxford
- BVC (Very Competent), City Law School
- Major Exhibition, Inner Temple
- Duke of Edinburgh Entrance Award, Inner Temple
- Certificates of Distinction in Teaching, Harvard University (1994-1999)
Professional qualifications & appointments
- Family Mediator (Resolution)
- Inner Temple
- Resolution (Associate Member)