Esther Lieu analyses I County Council v TD & Others  EWHC 379 (Fam) for Family Law Week and considers of the difference between care orders and supervision orders.
Esther Lieu is a specialist family lawyer with an emphasis on private family law matters and cases involving financial provision following divorce or dissolution of marriages and separation of unmarried couples.
Esther has a busy practice in financial remedies (from pre-nuptial and separation agreements through to contested final hearings), including applications brought under ToLATA and Schedule 1. She is a forceful negotiator at an FDR and balances the costs of further of litigation against the overarching aim of achieving the best outcome for her client. In particular she has experience of the following:
- Applications brought under ToLATA including equitable accounting claims
- Maintenance applications (brought under MCA 1973, Schedule 1 CA 1989 and CSA 1991)
- Interveners and third party interests
- Inherited wealth
- Non-matrimonial property
- Variation and enforcement applications
- Applications for financial relief following overseas divorce (MFPA 1984)
- Applications for injunctive relief
H v H (2019)
Acted for the husband in a case that involved the wife’s receipt of a significant inheritance at the time of separation, and the death of the husband’s mother during proceedings resulting in his own inheritance (that was tied up with other family members).
B v A (2019)
Represented the father in an application brought under Schedule 1 CA1989 by the mother for child maintenance to extend beyond the child’s 18th birthday on account of special circumstances.. Both applications were successfully opposed following detailed analysis of the Child Support Act 1991.
M v M (2017), J v C (2017), K v M (2017)
Advice provided in several cases concerning division of property owned by un-married couples, to include instances where there was no declaration of trust, an application to set aside a declaration of trust, calculation of beneficial interests and claims for equitable accounting.
P v P (2017)
Acted for the Russian wife in protracted proceedings which included successfully obtaining permission to apply for financial relief following an overseas divorce in the Royal Courts of Justice, obtaining injunctive relief against the husband’s attempt to dissipate assets, countering the husband’s father’s claim to a third party interest in the property and achieving a very positive outcome at final hearing.
Esther is regularly instructed in applications for child arrangements orders, specific issue and prohibited steps orders, as well as injunctions, enforcement applications, fact-finding hearings and contested final hearings. In particular, she has experience in cases involving:
- Parental alienation/ intractable hostility
- Transfer of residence
- Disputed jurisdiction (within the U.K. and international)
- Internal and international relocation
- Allegations of domestic violence and finding of fact hearings
W v W (2019)
Represented the father during a 3 day fact-find within a long-running application for child arrangements orders, and successfully defended him in committal proceedings brought by the mother.
B v B (2019)
Acted for the father in successfully opposing the mother’s application to relocate with the parties’ children who lived with her.
S v S (2019)
Acted for the father following the unlawful removal of his children by the mother to Scotland. Successfully obtained an interim order that the children be returned to England and successfully argued (against the mother) that England retained jurisdiction to hear the matter. The children were returned to the father’s care and he was ultimately granted a live with order in respect of both.
E v E (2018)
Represented the Children’s Guardian in an application by the father for a transfer of residence. A fact-find established that the mother had alienated the father from the children; subsequently the Guardian recommended a transfer of residence which was ultimately ordered by the court following a contested final hearing.
V v G (2017)
Acted for the father seeking contact and then residence orders in respect of his daughter in a long running protracted matter in the High Court which included the appointment of r.16.4 Guardian, committal proceedings against the mother (she was found guilty of contempt), a finding of fact (which established that the mother had alienated the father) and the making of Interim Supervision Orders in respect of the child.
Remote FDR Hearing Service
Esther is available for private remote FDR hearings. For more information on private remote FDR hearings please click here.
The difference between care orders and supervision orders28th Feb 2017
CJEU judgment concerning a matter of jurisdiction in relation to parental responsibility and determination of jurisdiction20th Feb 2017
Esther Lieu analyses W v X (Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility)  EUECJ C-499-15 for Family Law Week
Fact finding into serious injuries30th Dec 2016
Fact finding into serious injuries: Esther Lieu summarises A v W and Others No 1 (Fact Finding)  EWFC 64 for Family Law Week.
Application to relocate to Utah opposed by father and Guardian but allowed by the court20th Oct 2016
Esther Lieu analyses M v F  EWHC 3194 (Fam) (Jan 2017) for Family Law Week.
Application for parental orders under HFEA 2008 adjourned generally due to the respondent’s refusal to consent to the order being made28th Oct 2016
Esther Lieu summarises Re AB (Surrogacy: Consent)  EWHC 2643 (Fam) (Nov 16).
Delayed child support proceedings a breach of Article 6 rights3rd Aug 2016
ECtHR Judgment finding that the delays in the mother’s enforcement proceedings against her former husband for unpaid child support constituted a breach of her Article 6 rights: Veiga da Silva Braga v Portugal (Application No. 39507/13) (Aug 16).
The separate representation of children in child abduction proceedings6th Jan 2015
An analysis by Esther Lieu for Family Law Week.
Family Drug and Alcohol Court: A Practitioners’ and Judge’s Perspective31st Jul 2014
An analysis by Sarah Jennings & Esther Lieu, 3PB, with District Judge Julie Exton look at the Family Drug and Alcohol Court for Family Law Week.
The Termination of Parental Responsibility4th Mar 2014
Esther Lieu explores the circumstances in which parental responsibility may be terminated and considers the effect of s.4(2A) in anticipation of the Court of Appeal's judgment in the appeal from CW v SG.
Facilitating the Return of Abducted Children: the ECtHR Judgment in Raw v France18th Mar 2013
Esther Lieu and Adam Weiss, Legal Director, The AIRE Centre, explain the ECtHR's recent decision in Raw v France which considered, amongst other matters, the enforcement of court orders and the circumstances in which a parent could represent their children in Strasbourg proceedings.
“ I have felt very well supported by you throughout your involvement in this case and could not have been more confident in your representation of me in the court room”
Client, January 2020
“I just wanted to email to pass on my thanks as Esther has been fantastic and greatly helped with settling the financial case for the client as well a previously settling the children act case for another client as well.”
Solicitor, January 2020
"Esther Lieu was outstanding, she was supportive and explained my options very clearly. She was very understanding and knowledgeable."
Client, April 2019
- College of Law, BPTC (Merit) 2012
- Inner Temple Exhibition Scholar 2011
- College of Law, GDL (Commendation) 2011
- University of London, MA - Human Rights (Merit) 2006
- University of Bristol, BSc – Philosophy and Psychology (2:1) 2005
- Family Law Bar Association (Treasurer, Western Circuit)
- Human Rights Lawyers Association
- Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association (previously a Trustee)
Esther Lieu is qualified to accept instructions directly from members of the public and professional clients under the Direct Public Access scheme.More Information