Public and Regulatory
Regulatory Law (including maritime, fire regulation, CQC, environmental law and Heath and Safety matters)
Nicholas undertakes instructions in a wide variety of regulatory and quasi-criminal matters.
Nicholas has prosecuted for a number of local and national authorities and has extensive experience representing employers, employees, directors and companies often charged with complicated and offences that carry profound reputation damage.
Nicholas is often instructed by insurance firms and risk assessors to provide advice on the merits of an insurance funded case before action and is well versed in providing realistic, swift and cost appropriate advice to both those insured and self funding. As such he provides advice and assistance targeted to avoid, challenge or minimise the effects of any regulatory investigation or prosecution whilst maintaining a commercial eye to an individual means and ultimate business reputation of the client.
- R v X
Currently instructed Defence Counsel in an environmental prosecution of a company director for alleged chemical air pollution
- R v X
Currently instructed Defence Counsel in an environmental prosecution of a farmer for breaching of the clean air act
- R v X
Currently instructed Defence counsel in a food safety prosecution representing both the company and CEO
- R x X
Representing the Director of a care home in which a tragic fire had led to the death of one of the residents. This case involved significant breaches of the Fire Regulatory Code. Early intervention led to the Director of the home being found not guilty and the position of the company was enhanced by limiting the number of alleged breaches admitted resulting in reduced costs and fine
- R v X
Advising positively on the merits of a Care Quality Commission Appeals tribunal involving the cancellation of a service providers registration across a large and well established care home business
- R v X
Representing a nationwide Salvage and building demolition Merchants charged with exceeding their landfill license. This case involved advising on the merits of a dismissal argument and the tactical approach this may have on the merits of the protection. The Environmental Agency upon consideration of the potential submission accepted a lower sanction resulting in a significantly lower fine with reduced reputation damage
- R v X
Representing a large property development firm and its primary directors charged with significant TPO breaches
- R v X
Representing a firm of nationwide food suppliers who were accused of breaching the EU Regulations on food hygiene involving the storage of milk and the production of cheese. This highly complicated matter met with success in avoiding findings in relation to the storage and hygiene of the primary functions of the business
- R v X
Provided advice on Alcohol licensing requirements for a large international warehousing and packaging company
Recent Non-Sports Disciplinary Hearing
- R v X
Successfully representing a nurse before the NMC in relation to fitness to practice allegation
- Dorset Trading standards v 24/7 Plumbing
Nick Cotter was instructed on behalf of the council in relation to breaches of trading by this subsidiary of a large nationwide plumbing business. Nick advised on the instruction of experts plus the digging up of a garden in order to demonstrate that the defendant had undertaken otiose and incompetent work. The trial was ultimately successful against both the company and its employees
- Berkshire Trading Standards v X
Nick was instructed to defend a well heeled gentleman who had set up a vintage clothing company selling items including Converse trainers. The trainers were fake and to compound matters this was a second offence. Nick negotiated guilty pleas and avoided a prison sentence for his client. However the real impact of the case was POCA. The BTS sought a figure in the high hundred of thousands. In the end the figure was reduced to close to a hundred thousand albeit after a full hearing and the use of a forensic accountant
- R v X
Prosecuting on behalf of Trading Standards a nationwide rogue drainage company who targeted and overcharged elderly victims. This significant and successful prosecution required the assistance of a number of drainage experts and the excavation of the victims' properties and gardens but resulted in a successful prosecution that compensated the victims of the companies and resulted in a significant fine
- R v X
Currently representing an entrepreneur accused of trademark breaches on his trainer footwear line.
Health and Safety
- HSE v X
A canal garage was being dismantled when a side of the boat fell over and led to an employee being trapped. Sadly he lost his legs. Nick was involved in negotiating a plea package, ensuring that only the company was prosecuted and in providing full mitigation to keep the company operational
- HSE v X
A lift engineering company working on the Cross rail project did not ensure appropriate safe guards were in place. The lift fell unexpectedly and severed the thumb of an employee. Nick was instructed late but negotiated a plea package for the company and provided full mitigation to reduce the impact of a fine
- Lincoln Council v X
A care home was prosecuted under the HS regulations. Three person died and the home was charged that it did not properly safeguard for risk for the HS of the residents of the home. Nick successfully challenged the issue of causation (via a quasi-newton hearing) and ensured that a limited package of pleas in this complex case was advanced plus substantial mitigation
- R v X
Instructed Defence Counsel on behalf of the company in an on going matter alleging the multiple deaths of non-employees within a care home environment
- R v X
Representing a company that ran a number of docks on the river Thames. Sadly one of its employees had suffered a terrible accident resulting in the loss of both of his legs. The company was advised quickly on the merits of the case in order to mitigate effectively and productively for both the company and the victim.
Marine and Fisheries Law
Nicholas has expertise that focuses on the maritime sector and linked Regulatory and Heath and Safety spheres.
He has significant experience in providing pre-charge advice and guidance for both Defence and Prosecution teams and is regularly instructed to represent owners, employees and companies.
He has provided advice in actions brought by the Maritime Coastguard Agency (‘MCA’) (HSE) and has also defended a number of cases prosecuted by the Marine Management Organisation (‘MMO’).
Recent cases have included:
- Collisions at sea
- Health and safety breaches
- Environmental issues
- Registration and technical breaches.
His previous clients include: masters, owners, charterers, operators, companies and prosecuting agencies.
R v X
Instructed Defence Counsel representing the Master of a cargo ferry being prosecuted under the Merchant Shipping Act (Collisions) for a significant accident involving another large cargo ferry.
R v X
Instructed Defence counsel representing a international captain accused of removing salvage from shipwrecks within British waters without an appropriate licence.
R v X
Representing an international salvage operation after being boarded by the Royal Navy and subsequently prosecuted for salvage work conducted within the Economic Zone.
R v X
Advising the MCA in relation to a fisheries/harbour licensing prosecution.
R v X
Representing the Company owners of a private harbour in relation to a significant industrial accident that occurred during the dismantling of a barge.
Nicholas regularly appears before sports regulation / disciplinary hearings and provides advice on rules, compliance and the consequences of infringements.
Nicholas has a significant background in malfeasance, bribery and fraud and is well placed to deal with these matters arising from corruption and criminality in sport. He has a particular specialisation in anti-doping law both Defending and Prosecuting.
UKAD v X
Currently instructed Counsel for UKAD in a unique body dimorphism case pertaining to reasonable excuse and failing to supply
UKAD v X
Instructed Counsel for a professional regional rugby player who fell foul of the use of banned supplement. UKAD conceded that some evidence existed which supported lack of doping education and no intentional use and the panel in turn were convinced of the merit of early return permission to training despite the imposition of a disqualification period
UKAD v X
Instructed Counsel for UKAD in a case that resulted in the first UK lifetime ban for a member of the “support team” for an athlete and impacted on the issue of who could be included within the definition of support personnel (namely an athlete's parent)
BHA v X
Represented a professional flat racing Jockey before a full disciplinary panel accused by the BHA of the offences of sample tampering and bringing the sport into disrepute. The issue resolved around the use of illicit substances and the athletes attempt to use /acquire another
individuals sample to mask the primary offence
UKAD v X
Providing advice to a basketball player charged with a drug tampering offence namely that the athlete tried to pass off another athletes name when providing a sample. The case reached the tribunal and the athlete was given a significant reduced sentence in light of his mitigation and early advice
UKAD v X
Representing a cyclist who had refused to provide a sample when requested after competition. The athlete was advised early in the matter and the key issues argued before the tribunal were primarily “compelling justification” and “no significant fault” for failing to provide a sample. The tribunal recorded a finding of no significant fault in favour of the cyclist and a much reduced ban. Nicholas also subsequently advised on the implications of disqualification upon prize money
NADP (APPEAL) v LLEWLLYN
Representing a young boxer who had taken a sports supplement. The supplement contained a substance banned during competition and the existence of the substance within the supplement was not known to the athlete. The athlete in his first instance tribunal was found to have had “no significant fault” when he ingested the substance. The athlete had further argued that he did not intend to “enhance his sports performance” with the supplement. This argument failed before the Tribunal and was the subject of significant legal debate (Foggo / Oliveria cases) internationally. The athlete's original ban was reduced by 50% by the original panel however UKAD did not appeal this on the basis that they believed that the Oliveria approach should have been followed rather than Foggo in reaching a decision. This placed the Athlete in jeopardy of having his period of disqualification increased in the de novo hearing if the panel continued to follow the Foggo approach but rejected his mitigation. The NADP chaired by Mr Peter Leaver QC disagreed with the suggestion that the Oliveria approach should have been followed and indicated that they did not agree with the reduction in the period of disqualification originally imposed by the First Instance Tribunal. However the Appeal Panel was persuaded not to alter the original sanction reduction afforded to the athlete. https://www.sportresolutions.co.uk/news/view/uk-antidoping-vs-ryanllewellyn-appeal
Has a general criminal and regulatory practice, with an emphasis on the Western Circuit and London. He has a track record of acting in cases involving fraud, organised crime, serious sexual offences and murder. His expertise also includes regulatory law with particular experience handling environmental law and health and safety matters.
"A very client-friendly and expert criminal counsel."
Recent work: Defended one of the defendants charged with the aggravated burglary of a Hatton Garden jeweller.
Chambers UK 2019/Western (Bar) - Crime - Band 3
Strengths: "He has a terrific brain, a formidable work ethic, an unflappable demeanour and his tactical awareness can make the difference in a tricky case."
Chambers UK 2018/Western (Bar) - Crime - Band 3
'Has a general criminal and regulatory practice, and is active on both the Western and South Eastern Circuits. He has a track record of acting in cases involving fraud, organised crime and serious sexual offences.'
Strengths: "Completely unflappable, he has an extremely good temperament in court. Destined for great things." "A very capable advocate."'
Chambers UK 2017/Western (Bar) - Crime - Band 3
'A consummately able barrister.'
Legal 500 2018/19/Crime - Tier 1
‘A formidable advocate.’
Legal 500 2017/Regional Bar - Western Circuit, Crime – Leading juniors
“Now this case is over, may I express my significant grateful thanks for the way you have consistently and over a lengthy period handled the complex case of R v O.
This case was never destined to be easy, and indeed it proved to be one of the most difficult cases I have dealt with in the last 30 years. I am in awe of the skill, professionalism, compassion and knowledge that you put into this case, coupled with your ability to look after, control and satisfy a very difficult Client.
Your willingness to see our Client without Solicitor and to promptly report back to myself was an outstanding pathway to enabling us to deal efficiently with a client of the most demanding nature, who barely spent a day off the telephone whilst in prison.
Notwithstanding the sentence passed, I think it is fair to say that without your extremely high level of expertise, the result could have been tremendously less beneficial to the Client.
I think it would be correct in this case to concentrate on the level of acquittals obtained for O, which speak volumes for your ability and dedication."
Instructing Solicitor, Bournemouth, June 2017
- Diploma in Law / CPE (Bristol)
- BA (Hons) History
Professional qualifications & appointments
- A Grade 4 Crown Prosecutor
- Member of the Rape Panel of Crown Prosecutors
- Member of the Serious Crime Panel of Crown Prosecutors
- Member of the Serious Fraud Panel of Crown Prosecutors
- The Honourable Society of Lincoln’s Inn
- Association of Commonwealth Criminal Lawyers
British Association for Sport and Law (BASL)
- Member of the Western Circuit
- Proceeds of Crime Lawyers' Association
- The Health & Safety Lawyers Association
- Member of the Criminal Bar Association
Nicholas Cotter is qualified to accept instructions directly from members of the public and professional clients under the Direct Public Access scheme.More Information
3PB Barristers trio represents defendants in UK largest conspiracy to drone-deliver drugs to prisons
3PB Barristers, Nick Cotter, Elisabeth Bussey-Jones and Adam Norris, have represented defendants in Birmingham Crown Court in relation to a conspiracy to bring...Read more
3PB Barrister Nicholas Cotter argues exception circumstances in a dishonesty case before the SRA
Nicholas Cotter successfully argues exceptional circumstances in a dishonesty case before the Solicitors Regulatory Tribunal. The case involved evidentially cha...Read more
3PB's Public and Regulatory team provide an update on the CQC and Practice and Procedure
On 15 March 2018 3PB Barristers Nicholas Leviseur, Nicholas Cotter and Sunyana Sharma presented a seminar on The CQC: Aims, Powers and Enforcement Powers and...Read more