Hamish Dunlop is an experienced family law advocate and is head of the 3PB Family group.
Hamish’s family law practice is concerned with the financial claims of: spouses on divorce; co-habitees upon separation and dependants from the estate of a deceased. In the context of financial provision on divorce, he has particular expertise in cases involving family businesses; professional clients and the military.
He advises and represents co-habitees, co owners and other family members on property issues including legal and beneficial ownerships and promissory and proprietary estoppel.
Hamish was until 2012 the Chair of the Hampshire Family Justice Money and Property Committee. He is regularly invited to lecture at external conferences and offers bespoke in-house training seminars for clients.
Hamish is also a clinical negligence specialist. His practice includes high value claims and he advises on personal and medical short term and long term care and life time housing requirements where appropriate.
Hamish’s recent important cases have involved failures in GP referrals leading to cauda equina lesions and subarachnoid haemorrhage. His claims against Hospital specialists have included: A&E Departments; obstetrics; orthopaedic and general surgery.
He also undertakes product liability claims.
Hamish is experienced in claims involving: housing requirements; lifetime care and complex dependency claims.
Add this expertise to your shortlist
Hamish’s family law practice is concerned with the financial claims of: spouses on divorce; co-habitees upon separation and dependants from the estate of a deceased. In the context of financial provision on divorce, he has particular expertise in: cases involving family businesses; professional clients and the military.
He advises and represents co-habitees, co-owners and other family members on property issues including: legal and beneficial ownerships (and the Court’s powers under TOLATA); promisory and proprietary estoppel. He advises on Inheritance Act claims.
Hamish provides pragmatic advice to clients in a sympathetic manner; her is robust and dogged in their representation. He is described in the 2016 edition of the Legal 500 as having: 'an excellent rapport with clients and is truly knowledgeable in the complex field of financial remedy.'
Hamish has been Head of the Family group at 3PB since 2015.
Owens v Owens ( EWCA Civ 182)
Acting for a Husband who has successfully contested his Wife’s petition for divorce based on grounds of unreasonable behaviour. The Court of Appeal rejected the Wife’s appeal and the Wife has now petitioned the Supreme Court. The Wife’s claim for financial provision is adjourned pending determination of the appeal.
C v C (2016)
Acting for a Wife in her claim for financial provision from Husband. Although the parties themselves had modest assets, Wife was defending Husband’s attack on a family trust in which she had an interest: both in relation to income (until her father’s death) and thereafter capital. The Trust was valued at £3.5M.
B v B Roberts J. High Court (2015)
Financial Provision on Divorce. Parties own and Husband operated a successful general trading business from a site in Oxfordshire. The parties thereby acquired and retained a portfolio of UK investment properties. Value of assets = c.£14M. Husband disposed of a number of the properties into offshore trusts which Wife is attacking. The Oxfordshire business site is currently under development for residential housing and there are complicated tax issues.
A v V ((2015) CFC)
Applications for: a declaration of paternity and relief under Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989. Representing a UK resident mother in her applications against a Dubai- based businessman father. Father was extremely wealthy and chose not to disclose his assets, running a ‘millionaires defence’. The case involved issues of: jurisdiction and the extent to which a previous agreement reached by the parties should be binding on them.
MB v The Executors of EB (Deceased) ((2016) Bristol CC)
Representing a widow on her application for financial provision from her deceased husband’s estate. Her husband’s estate left nothing to the widow save an entitlement to remain at her family home for life.
D-C and ors v The Personal Representatives of N-C (2013)
Inheritance Act claim. The claim was bought by a number of dependants against the estate of the deceased who was a property developer on the South Coast. The estate included a number of properties and the shares in the deceased’s company.
S v D (2013)
Financial claims between a Cohabiting Couple. Competing claims to various interests in the parties’ family home; farming business and associated farmland.
C v R (2013)
Financial claims over Dynastic Wealth within a Family. Competing TOLATA claims concerning 2 existing properties but involving tracing financial interests through a 3 further houses.
15th Aug 2017
Read Hamish Dunlop's lecture notes on Owens v Owens, a groundbreaking divorce case scheduled to go to the Supreme Court. Hamish's analysis explains why this case could lead to the introduction of no-fault divorce in the UK.
2nd Sep 2016
Hamish Dunlop provides insightful commentary on Sharland and Gohill cases
24th Mar 2017
Head of 3PB's Family Law Group Hamish Dunlop draws conclusions from The Blue Cross and others v. Heather Ilot [ UKSC 17]. Head of 3PB's Family Law Group Hamish Dunlop draws conclusions from The Blue Cross and others v. Heather Ilot [ UKSC 17]
On 15th March 2017, the Supreme Court gave judgment in the appeal of The Blue Cross and others –v- Heather Ilot [ UKSC 17]. The case concerns Mrs Ilot's application brought under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 ('the Act').
Although the Act is now over 40 years old, it has never received substantive review by the most senior Court in the country. This appeal has therefore been eagerly awaited by practitioners in the expectation of guidance in particular in relation to: managing the frequent tension between a Claimant's needs and the testator's wishes; and the definitions of reasonable financial provision and maintenance under the Act.
The case concerns the class of Claimant whose dependency arises in a context of being other than a spouse or civil partner. It obviously remains to be seen whether the Court will now find an opportunity to review the law in cases involving a spouse as Claimant. In the meantime, this case provides specific assistance in relation to 'non-spouse' cases and some general jurisprudence in relation to all claims under the Act.
Add this expertise to your shortlist
Hamish is an experienced personal injury and clinical negligence barrister who enjoys a formidable reputation for his expertise and client friendly manner. He advises and represents clients on a range of personal injury and clinical negligence claims, involving both serious injury and death. His practice includes high value and sometimes high profile claims and he advises on personal and medical short term and long term care and life time housing requirements where appropriate.
He also undertakes product liability claims. Hamish is experienced in claims involving: housing requirements; lifetime care and complex dependency claims. As an ancillary relief practitioner, he has a particular specialism for dependency claims by wives; partners and children.
Regarding his clinical negligence, advice has included failures in GP referrals leading to: cauda equina lesions; subarachnoid haemorrhage; and limb amputations. His claims against hospital specialists have included A&E Departments; obstetrics; orthopaedic and general surgery. Until 26, Hamish sat as a legal assessor for the Nursing and Midwifery Council Disciplinary Committees.
- CD (Claimant) v NHS Hospital Trust (2017). Sub-standard treatment provided to a young patient during spinal surgery and post-operatively. The failures led to a significant loss of lower limb function and permanent pain.
- AB (Claimant) v NHS Hospital Trust (2017). Failure adequately to remove all products of conception following a birth by Caesarean section. The Claimant ultimately required a total abdominal hysterectomy, substantial urinary and bowel symptoms.
- M (Claimant) v Dr C and NHS Direct (2013) Failed diagnosis by NHS Call Direct GP and nurse. They both failed to diagnose a subdural haematoma which led to an aneurysm and very significantly cognitive and functional impairment. The Claimant requires long term care in a residential setting.
2nd Sep 2016
Hamish Dunlop's briefing on recent SC case of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board ( UKSC 11])
‘He builds affinity with clients and wins their confidence very quickly.’
Legal 500 2017/Regional Bar - Western Circuit, Family and children law – Leading juniors
‘Very experienced across the spectrum of personal injury law.’
Legal 500 2017/Regional Bar - Western Circuit, Personal injury and clinical negligence – Leading juniors
'He has excellent rapport with clients and is truly knowledgeable in the complex field of financial remedy.'
Legal 500 2016/Regional Bar - Western Circuit, Family and children law & Personal injury and clinical negligence – Leading juniors
'He has a fantastic rapport with clients and really knows his stuff'
Legal 500 2015/Regional Bar - Western Circuit, Family and children law & Personal injury and clinical negligence – Leading juniors
'Highly skilled in respect of pleadings, court presence and dealing with experts.'
Legal 500 2014/Western Circuit, Personal Injury and Clinical Negligence.
‘Precise and thorough’.
Legal 500 2014/Regional Bar - Western Circuit, Family
‘always conducts himself with the utmost professionalism’.
Legal 500 2013/Western Circuit - Family
‘court demeanour is controlled and eloquent'.
Legal 500 2012/Western Circuit - Family.
'A popular choice among claimants for challenging cases, he is especially renowned for his strength in cauda equina matters. He also handles catastrophic brain injury and birth injury cases stemming from failures in general practice.'
Strengths: "He's very good at breaking things down and getting to the root of legal and medical issues. In conferences he reins clients in, manages their expectations and explains the area in a way they can understand." "He handles tricky cases very well. He's good with the client and is good on detail."
Chambers UK 2018/Clinical Negligence - Western (Bar) - Band 1
'Recognised for his approach to complex cases, he demonstrates particular expertise in handling cauda equina matters. He provides additional support on care and housing requirements, as well as on dependency claims.
Strengths: "He is very thorough and approachable." "His real strength is in the testing of evidence. He can focus on factual evidence and chronology very well."'
Chambers UK 2017/Clinical Negligence - Western (Bar) - Band 1
'Has a strong practice focus on clinical negligence work, with complementary experience in the related areas of care and housing requirements for the afflicted. He particularly specialises in dependency claims being brought by spouses, children and partners.
Strengths: "His strengths are the way he handles sensitive clients with serious injuries, emotional clients, and his technical ability." "His attention to detail, responsiveness and client care are the best of the best."'
Chambers UK 2016/Clinical Negligence - Western (Bar) - Band 1
'Undertakes a wide range of work, with proficiency in cases relating to accommodation needs and lifetime care. In addition, he specialises in dependency claims brought forward by partners and children.
Expertise: "He's extremely user-friendly and clicks very well with clients."'
Chambers UK 2015/Clinical Negligence - Western (Bar) - Band 2
'...barrister with a significant reputation in the field. He is noted for his expertise in high-value serious injury and fatality claims.
Expertise: “He has extreme attention to detail and exceptional client care skills.” “He is brilliant. I always recommend him as my first choice for clients.”'
Chambers UK 2014/Clinical Negligence - Western (Bar) - Band 1
Professional qualifications & appointments
- Accredited Mediation Advocate
- Family Law Bar Association
- Western Circuit
Hamish Dunlop is qualified to accept instructions directly from members of the public and professional clients under the Direct Public Access scheme.More Information
Hamish Dunlop represents respondent in groundbreaking Owens v Owens divorce case
Hamish Dunlop, Head of 3PB’s Family Law Group, led by Nigel Dyer QC, and instructed by Hughes Paddison of Cheltenham, has represented the respondent Hugh Owen...Read more
3PB Barristers expands family services team
3PB Family has added 3 new barristers to its rapidly expanding specialist team. Oliver Thorne (2005 call), formerly of King’s Bench Chambers, will be based in...Read more
3PB's Head of Family Law Group Hamish Dunlop, led by Nigel Dyer QC, represents respondent in Owens v Owens
Hamish Dunlop, Head of 3PB’s Family Law Group, led by Nigel Dyer QC, has represented the respondent in the groundbreaking Owens v Owens case. The Court of App...Read more