Michelle Marnham, 3PB's Head of Personal Injury and Clinical Negligence, alongside future 3PB pupil Jeremy Warner have written on the Supreme Court Judgement in Paul v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust.
Clerk Details
- Clerk Name: Jordon Gallifant
- Clerk Telephone: 020 7583 8055
- Clerk Email: [email protected]
Clinical Negligence
Jeremy gained two years’ experience as a clinical negligence paralegal before joining 3PB. Since being called, Jeremy has:
- Advised on the delayed diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer, including the assessment of damages in a reduced life expectancy in the context of multiple co-morbidities.
- Drafted Advice and a Schedule of Loss for a claimant who suffered significant scarring and incontinence due a delay in diagnosis of necrotising fasciitis.
- Advised on secondary victim claims in the context of clinical negligence.
- Drafted pleadings in birth injury claims.
-
Articles -
Paul v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust [2024] UKSC 1
19th Jan 2024 -
Bilal and Malik v St George's University Hospital NHS Trust
12th Jul 20233PB's Head of Personal Injury and Clinical Negligence Michelle Marham, along with future 3PB pupil Jeremy Warner, has written about the recent case of Bilal and Malik v St George's University Hospital NHS Trust. Michelle and Jeremy explore the insight it provides into a post-Montgomery landscape and the clarification it offers on informed consent.
-
-
Recommendations “I was hugely impressed by Jeremy at the recent inquest. He was proactive, engaged and focussed, cutting to the heart of the key issues. His calm and thoughtful manner was a huge source of reassurance for the family during an incredibly difficult and emotional process. I look forward to instructing Jeremy again in the future”.
“I did consider Jeremy’s assessment of the relevant issues to be spot on and it was clear that he had gone through the papers with a fine tooth comb and noted pertinent issues. I would be more than happy to instruct you again on matters and will confirm the same to members of my team for their own files.”
“Jeremy clearly understood his brief well and had a good knowledge of the vagaries of credit hire and the specifics of this matter. Overall, this was a positive experience and a good outcome for the client, I would happily book him again for such work.”
“Jeremy has been very attentive to the details of the case and notified us in good time of any queries he thought the court would raise. He won our case in Court and we would definitely book him in again.”
“His communication prior to an up to the hearing was greatly appreciated and which resulted in a settlement moments before the hearing. I will not hesitate to instruct him again.”