Articles

Dr Zhen Ye writes on the recent Court of Appeal case ‘LLC Eurochem North-West-2 v Tecnimont S.P.A and another’.

3PB’s property and commercial law barrister Jack Webb writes a detailed guide to s.21 of the Housing Act 1988, offering key guidance to practitioners on how it may be used before the 30 April deadline.

Ashley Blood-Halvorsen writes an article on ‘In Kars v Brown and others’ which explains how once a spouse dies the other can still receive financial provision after divorce.

3PB’s John Jessup has written an article examining Sahara’s sale of crude oil to Sonara and the consequences of Sonara’s late payment.

Richard Whitehouse analyses the case of Blower v GH Canfield LLP [2025] EWCA Civ 1627, a claim that arose from settlement advice that was provided by solicitors, allegedly in a situation where there were conflicts of interest.

3PB’s specialist commercial, public and information law barrister, Mariya Peykova, writes about how Grok has sparked controversy in recent weeks after being used to generate non-consensual sexualised images, with victims predominantly being women and girls.

Katherine Anderson summarises the case of Sandie Peggie v Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton [4104864/2024], a case seen as a major test of the Equality Act 2010 regarding single-sex spaces. The tribunal has ruled that while trans women's use of female changing rooms is not inherently unlawful, employers must balance rights and make adjustments once a complaint from a female worker comes to light.

June Venters KC and Rachel Temple look at the recent landmark case of Re E (A Child) (Complex Fact-Finding: Allegations of Domestic Abuse and Alienating Behaviours) [2025] EWFC 422, in which they acted father at in the High Court.

Mark Green analyses the case of Dr Kate Barry v Upper Thames Medical Group and Others: [2025] EAT 146, in which HHJ Tayler provides guidance and a summary of the law of affirmation. In particular HHJ Tayler explains that if an employer is in repudiatory breach of contract, then multiple factors - not just delay - may be relevant to the question of affirmation.

Michael Smith analyses the case of Mr A and Ms B v C Ltd and Others [2025] EAT 165, a case that illustrates the complexity of assessing psychiatric injury in discrimination claims and the importance of applying correct legal tests.

Simon Tibbitts reflects on the case of Mayanja v City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council [2025] EAT 160, a case which highlights the risks posed by broad or generalised assessments of credibility.

Robin Pickard considers Abel Estate Agent Ltd & Ors v Elizabeth Reynolds [2025] EWCA Civ 1357, a case which provides clarity on the Employment Tribunal’s jurisdiction to consider claims that have not been the subject of early conciliation.