3PB barrister Sarah Bowen analyses the latest employment law cases
15th February 2018
3PB barrister Sarah Bowen analyses the latest employment law cases, covering:
- Age discrimination/Objective justification – Sargeant and Others v London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority and Others UKEAT/0116/17/LA and The Lord Chancellor and Anor v McCloud and Ors [2018] UKEAT/0071/17/2901
- Sex Discrimination – HM Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills v Interim Executive Board of Al-Hijrah School [2017] EWCA Civ 1426
- Discrimination – Time limits – Hale v Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust UKEAT/0342/16/LA
- PIDA and Jurisdiction – Bamieh v EULEX Kosovo and ors UKEAT/0268/16/RN
- UDW – ET Jurisdiction – Tyne and Wear Passenger Transport Executive v Sanderson and ors T/A Nexus UKEAT/0151/16
- WTR – Crawford v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd [2017] UKEAT/0316/06
Related News
-
3PB’s ‘best in their field’ employment and discrimination law team is delighted to have joined a select few chambers to be ranked in the Midlands in this area of law. The leading team retains its top tier team rankings in the Western and South Eastern Circuits. Clients comment on 'an exceptional chambers, from the first point of contact with the clerks through to the end of the matter’ with ‘their growth a testament to their...
Continue reading -
3PB Barristers (3 Paper Buildings), one of the UK's largest chambers, is delighted to announce a record number of rankings - totalling 193 - in the Legal 500 2026’s edition which is published today, compared with 167 last year. A total of 123 3PB barristers are now ranked in the Legal 500, up from 108 last year. The set is ranked in 26 areas of law across 4 large UK Circuits (London, South Eastern, Western...
Continue reading -
3PB Barristers (3 Paper Buildings) have been awarded a record number of individual rankings in the 2026 edition of Chambers and Partners, reaching a total of 104 (96 last year) achieved by 86 of its barristers. The national set has doubled its number of individual rankings in 5 years (52 in 2021) and is rewarded with accolades in 22 areas of law across the London Bar as well as in the North Eastern, South Eastern,...
Continue reading -
Joseph England analyses the case of Mr N Ahmed v Capital Arches Group Limited EAT [2025] 133, in which the EAT considered an ET’s decision that claims were presented out of time and the refusal to extend time on the ‘just and equitable’ basis. In doing so, the EAT analyses the distinction between events that occur as one off events with ongoing consequences and conduct extending over a period. This judgment will be of particular...
Continue reading
