Nigel Lickley QC successfully prosecutes Robert Hinz, convicted of murder
4th May 2017
Nigel Lickley QC leading Stuart Ellacott successfully prosecuted Robert Hinz who was convicted of the murder of his son aged 3 months.
Please click this link to view more information about the case.
Related News
-
3PB crime barrister Rebecca McKnight’s client was accused of causing really serious injuries with intent to cause really serious harm, in other words a section 18 offence under the Offences Against the Persons Act 1861. It was accepted that serious injuries had been caused by her client but the issue for trial was intent. After careful questioning of both the complainant and the defendant Rebecca’s client was acquitted. This vulnerable client would have faced a...
Continue reading -
3PB criminal barrister Nate Lara (pictured here) has successfully represented a client who was charged with multiple offences including rape and serious violence. After substantive advice, Nate's client entered pleas of guilty to serious allegations of violence, which mitigated his exposure to questions on his credibility and meant the cross-examination of the complainant would be both succinct and effective. Through cross-examination, Nate effectively challenged the reliability of the complainant’s evidence, exposing inconsistencies with the earlier...
Continue reading -
3PB Barristers’ specialist criminal defence barrister Nick Robinson has successfully defended his client ME, who was charged with rape. Nick’s client was arrested on suspicion of rape following an incident in Bournemouth in 2025. The complainant alleged ME had raped her after she changed her mind and refused to perform a sex act on him after having agreed to do so for money. The defence case was that the sexual activity was consensual, agreed in...
Continue reading -
Laura Deuxberry, 3PB's criminal, regulatory and public law barrister, was instructed by the CPS Special Crime Division in London, led by Kevin Dent KC, in the recent case of How and Yang [2026] EWCA Crim 476. Appearing in the Court of Appeal, the appellants argued that the original trial judge, HHJ Ashworth, should have allowed their submission of no case to answer on the trafficking charge. The Court of Appeal heard the appeal of the two appellants, one of whom...
Continue reading
