3PB property Barrister Edward Ross examines the possible impact of Islington LBC v Dyer on the validity of notices
7th April 2017
On 22 March 2017 the Court of Appeal delivered a short but important unanimous judgment on the construction and interpretation of a notice purportedly served pursuant to s.128 of the Housing Act 1996.
Edward Ross examines the facts surrounding the judgment and its potential impact on the validity of notices.
To read Edward's full analysis, please click here.
Related News
-
Victoria Hamblen, specialist property and estates barrister at 3PB Barristers (3 Paper Buildings), has written on the recent case of R (North Warwickshire Borough Council) v Secretary of State for Transport [2026] EWCA Civ 832, which involved a change to part of the design of the HS2 plans. The appeal, which related to a proposed 2.9km extension to the Bromford Tunnel which did not form part of the original planning permission, sought to identify whether...
Continue reading -
3PB Barristers (3 Paper Buildings) is pleased to announce that Robert Weatherley has been appointed as a Fee-Paid Judge of the First-tier Tribunal, sitting in the Property Chamber. Robert will be based in London, hearing cases involving residential property. Robert Weatherley is a specialist property law barrister, focusing on property and planning disputes, encompassing land registration, commercial property, residential landlord and tenant law, and agriculture. Robert is the co-author of the textbook “Restrictions on the...
Continue reading -
3PB’s property barristers, Cheryl Jones and Jack Felvus, have written an article titled ‘The Rectification of Wills Mistake and Re Macdougall [2026] EWHC 1142 (Ch)'. This article looks at the case of Re MacDougall [2026] EWHC 1142 (Ch). The court considered six main legal issues about making a will, as well as a separate issue called ademption. Five of the issues involved well-established legal rules, including mental capacity, understanding and approving a will, undue influence...
Continue reading -
3PB’s property barristers, Charles Irvine and Rachel Bale, have written an article titled ‘Sign Here (Sort Of): What Hudson v Hathway Really Settled for Constructive Trusts — and What It Didn't'. They discuss the recent decision of Reid-Roberts v Mei-Lin [2026] EWHC 49 (Ch) which provides a helpful gloss on the Court of Appeal case of Hudson v Hathway [2022] EWCA Civ 1648. Hathway clarified the requirements for creating a constructive trust through a post-acquisition...
Continue reading
