3PB Commercial Law Barrister Christopher Edwards provides an overview of the law relating to the Commercial Agents Directive and its latest developments in Webinar for Lexis Nexis.
8th March 2016
The Commercial Agents Directive fundamentally changes certain areas of the common law relating to Agency. To view this webinar and learn about latest developments with critical analysis and practical guidance, please click here.
To view Christopher Edwards profile, please follow this link.
Related News
-
Oliver Nunn has successfully represented the Respondent in an appeal concerning the Court’s jurisdiction to enter default judgment where a Defence has been filed out of time but an extension of time has been refused. The appeal arose out of proceedings brought by a finance provider to the private medical and dentistry sector. At first instance, the Defendant’s application for an extension of time to serve a Defence was dismissed and judgment was entered for...
Continue reading -
Judgment from the Supreme Court in the landmark appeal case of X and Y (Children: Adoption Order: Setting Aside) [2026] UKSC 13 has just been handed down. The case, which revolves around whether a court has jurisdiction to set aside a valid adoption order other than by way of appeal, featured 3PB family barristers Dorian Day and Samantha Smith for the applicant, led by Nick Goodwin KC and instructed by Emily Boardman at Boardman, Hawkins...
Continue reading -
3PB's specialist criminal law barrister, Ben Thompson, successfully represented a vulnerable defendant facing an indictment alleging coercive and controlling behaviour, non-fatal suffocation, and criminal damage. In the months leading up to trial, the Crown did not pursue reasonable lines of enquiry identified by the Defence, including relevant text message evidence. Ultimately, recognising the importance of that material, the Crown applied to adjourn the trial. Ben prepared a detailed Abuse of Process application, relying on R v...
Continue reading -
3PB criminal barrister Nate Lara (pictured here) has successfully represented a client who was charged with multiple offences including rape and serious violence. After substantive advice, Nate's client entered pleas of guilty to serious allegations of violence, which mitigated his exposure to questions on his credibility and meant the cross-examination of the complainant would be both succinct and effective. Through cross-examination, Nate effectively challenged the reliability of the complainant’s evidence, exposing inconsistencies with the earlier...
Continue reading
