3PB celebrates Adam Feest's appointment as Queen's Counsel
15th March 2016
Chambers was delighted to host a party at the Guildhall in Winchester on 10th March to celebrate Adam Feest’s appointment as Queen’s Counsel. Clients, friends and colleagues were in attendance to offer their congratulations.?
Related News
-
7th October 2025
Amy Lush returns from maternity leave
3PB Barristers (3 Paper Buildings) is delighted to welcome family law barrister Amy Lush back to chambers from maternity leave from 6 October 2025. Amy specialises in all aspects of private children and financial remedies law including financial disputes under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, private law children proceedings including applications for enforcement and variation of child arrangements orders, and non-molestation and occupation orders. Ranked by Chambers and Partners for Family: Children on the Western...
Continue reading -
16th October 2025
3PB’s Family Law Team excels in Chambers & Partners 2026
3PB Barristers’ Family Law team has achieved 34 individual rankings (+7 compared with 2025) in this year’s Chambers and Partners edition published today. 29 of our family law barristers are ranked across 5 Circuits: in London, the Midlands, North Eastern, South Eastern and Western. Our team retains its Band 1 rankings for both Family Children and Family Finance in the Midlands, and its Band 2 ranking in Western. In our Midland clients’ own words "The...
Continue reading -
22nd September 2025
Join us at the Winchester Legal Walk on 2nd October
The Recorder of Winchester is organising Winchester's first 10K Legal Walk in support of Citizens Advice Winchester District, aided by 3PB's Gemma White. Join us on Thursday 2nd October at 4:45pm at Winchester Crown Court or RSVP [email protected] by 2pm on Thursday 25th September. Click here to donate.
Continue reading -
31st October 2025
Nate Lara successful in sentence reduction in the Court of Appeal
3PB criminal law barrister Nate Lara (pictured here) has been successful in the Court of Appeal, arguing that the original sentence imposed in the Crown Court was manifestly excessive and wrong in principle. The defendant received a sentence of imprisonment of 30 months. Nate argued that despite the aggravating features the sentence was excessive, going outside the range in the relevant sentencing guidelines, without sufficient justification for doing so. Nate also argued that the court...
Continue reading