Articles

Paul Newman, Barrister and Mediator of 3PB writes an informative article on when claims consultants become lawyers (or do they)?

3PB's Robert Courts comments on the Court of Appeal's recent judgment in the conjoined cases of Broadhurst (1) & Taylor (2) v Tan (1) & Smith (2) [2016] EWCA Civ 94

3PB Family law barrister Sarah Jennings examines the purpose of and procedure for obtaining tipstaff orders for the Family Law Week.

3PB's family law barrister Sarah Jennings provides summary for recent Court of Appeal case of Re M [2016] EWCA Civ 61 for the Family Law Week.

3PB's commercial law barrister Seb Oram authors 'After Schrems, how lawful is cloud storage?'. An analysis of Case C-362/14 Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner.

Construction law: The CDM Regulations 2015 and novated designer appointments - an update for Lexis Nexis by Seb Oram of 3PB Barristers.

On the anniversary of the CDM Regulations 2015 coming into force, Seb Oram presents a LexisNexis webinar on their effect and on the practical issues that they raise for the Construction and Engineering sectors.

The CDM Regulations 2015: changes and impact - an update by 3PB's construction law barrister, Seb Oram.

Sharan Sanghera examines the Court's decision finding that two claimants were precluded by the ex turpi causa principle from recovering damages in Joseph Thomas Beaumont & Lewis O'Neill v David Ferrer [2016] EWHC Civ 768.

The correct application of cpr 45.49c by Sharan Sanghera - Bruno Manuel dos Santos Mendes V Hochtief (UK) Construction Ltd [2016] EWHC 976 (QB)

It's not over until it's over - TZ v General Medical Council [2015] EWHC 1001 Admin, Gilbart J - A case review by Shruti Sharma

The recent decision of the EAT in Schwarzenbach and Anor v Jones UKEAT/0100/15/DM involved a dispute over the question of whether two employers were "associated" for the purposes of s231 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, giving Mr Jones sufficient continuity of service to bring a complaint of unfair dismissal. Stephen Wyeth successfully acted for the claimant both at first instance and in resisting the appeal by Mr and Mrs Schwarzenbach in this reported case.