Articles

Ben Amunwa has written an in-depth analysis on the case of R (PZP) v HS Academy Trust and another [2026] EWHC 489 (Admin), offering practitioners guidance into the key points to take away from this judgment.

Dr Zhen Ye writes on the recent Court of Appeal case ‘LLC Eurochem North-West-2 v Tecnimont S.P.A and another’.

Following her recent attendance of the Dublin medico-legal conference, Emma McIlveen reflects on the unique legal and ethical minefields that the new perk of egg freezing can create for businesses who offer it to their employees.

Daniel Brown reviews Lamb v Teva UK Ltd [2026] EAT 8 and the EAT’s useful reminder that the question of whether a dismissal was fair or unfair cannot be answered by working through a procedural checklist: in every case, the reason for dismissal and the procedure followed must be viewed broadly and together.

3PB’s property and commercial law barrister Jack Webb writes a detailed guide to s.21 of the Housing Act 1988, offering key guidance to practitioners on how it may be used before the 30 April deadline.

Sarah Clarke considers the EAT's judgment in Dada v The Scottish Ministers [2026] EAT 13 and the emphasis placed on tribunals to not stick slavishly to the section 33 Limitation Act factors when considering whether to extend time under s123 EQA.

Liz Adams provides an in-depth analysis of the Law Commission’s first major review of disabled children’s social care over three decades.

Liz examines key areas of legal significance and outlines the proposals that may have the most immediate and noticeable impact for families and local authorities, followed by a consideration of the steps that wll turn the report into meaningful reform.

Liz's article was published in the Family Law Journal's February edition and is available to read via a LexisNexis subscription.

In Milrine v DHL Services Ltd [2026] EAT 31, the EAT considers the impact of a flawed appeal process in circumstances where the dismissal might otherwise be considered to be fair.

Alex Leonhardt reviews the case.

Ashley Blood-Halvorsen writes an article on ‘In Kars v Brown and others’ which explains how once a spouse dies the other can still receive financial provision after divorce.

3PB’s John Jessup has written an article examining Sahara’s sale of crude oil to Sonara and the consequences of Sonara’s late payment.

Michael Smith analyses the case of Odusanya v Pennine Care Foundation Trust & Others [2026] EAT 5, in which the EAT's decision provides helpful clarification of the boundary between a witness’s obligation not to discuss their evidence while under oath and their right to take legal advice on a procedural matter arising in the course of proceedings.

Richard Whitehouse analyses the case of Blower v GH Canfield LLP [2025] EWCA Civ 1627, a claim that arose from settlement advice that was provided by solicitors, allegedly in a situation where there were conflicts of interest.