3PB wins 'Highly Commended' and Runner up for Chambers of the Year at the British Legal Awards 2018
30th November 2018
3 Paper Buildings (3PB Barristers) were named as highly commended and the runner up for the 'Chambers of The Year 2018' - ahead of the other five shortlisted chambers - at last night's British Legal Awards held at Finsbury Square in London.
We are very proud of our team of barristers, clerks and staff. Congratulations to the worthy winners and to all nominated.
Related News
-
3PB Barristers (3 Paper Buildings) is delighted to welcome family law barrister Ria Herbert back to chambers from maternity leave on Tuesday 1 September, 2026. Ria has a busy practice, welcoming instructions across a wide range of family law encompassing both public and private law children cases, injunction and domestic abuse, and financial remedies including TOLATA matters. Ria also acts for both individuals and local authorities in cases involving Court of Protection matters. She is...
Continue reading -
3PB’s property barristers, Charles Irvine and Rachel Bale, have written an article titled ‘Sign Here (Sort Of): What Hudson v Hathway Really Settled for Constructive Trusts — and What It Didn't'. They discuss the recent decision of Reid-Roberts v Mei-Lin [2026] EWHC 49 (Ch) which provides a helpful gloss on the Court of Appeal case of Hudson v Hathway [2022] EWCA Civ 1648. Hathway clarified the requirements for creating a constructive trust through a post-acquisition...
Continue reading -
3PB’s property barristers, Charles Irvine and Kinza Wahid, have written an article titled “The Presumption of Advancement and How to Defeat Orders for Sale: The position after Kroll Agency Services Ltd v Inlustrem Maritime Ltd [2026] EWHC 1453 (KB)”. They discuss how family members often contribute to the purchase of a home, but informal arrangements can lead to disputes over ownership, which judgment creditors seeking to enforce a final charging order should be wary of...
Continue reading -
3PB’s specialist intellectual property barrister Mark Wilden acted again for, in this case the successful respondent, JJH Enterprises (trading as ValueLicensing), in two appeals brought by Microsoft against decisions of the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) for which judgment was handed down yesterday. ValueLicensing claims that Microsoft stifled the supply of second-hand computer programs and software licences by placing restrictions in the relevant contracts and moving customers from the use of perpetual licences onto a subscription-based...
Continue reading
