Sheena Cassidy presents 3PB sponsors Diversity and Inclusion Award in London ceremony
30th September 2016
Sheena Cassidy, Deputy Head of Chambers at 3PB, presented the 3PB Diversity and Inclusion award at ceremony in London. Giles Wilson
Related News
-
3PB’s “stand-out” Personal Injury and Clinical Negligence team welcomes the latest Legal 500 results
The 2026 Legal 500 edition marks another outstanding set of results for 3PB’s Personal Injury and Clinical Negligence team. Clients laud 3PB as ‘fantastic chambers‘, with ‘barristers in the field of clinical negligence […] excellent and extremely knowledgeable in their field‘, identifying the team as ‘first choice chambers for clinical negligence’. The team ‘offers a wide range of expert counsel in the personal injury department who are always ready to assist‘. Clients conclude that '3PB...
Continue reading -
3PB Barristers welcomes 6 rankings for 5 of its Personal Injury and Clinical Negligence barristers in London and in the Western Circuit. The team has secured a new ranking for Personal Injury in the Western Circuit, while maintaining its Band 2 position for Clinical Negligence in the Western too. Our individual barristers are praised for their outstanding advocacy and expert skills across the board. The clerking team, led by “very communicative and approachable” Practice Director...
Continue reading -
3PB’s Commercial barristers have been rewarded with 6 rankings in this year's Chambers UK edition across the specialist areas of Commercial Law and Professional Negligence. Head of group Patrick Heneghan commented “I am delighted that our barristers continue to be acknowledged for their advocacy and their ability to deal with complex matters expertly. My thanks go to the clients who never fail to take part in the directories’ research.” Our many congratulations to Alexander Whatley,...
Continue reading -
Joseph England analyses the case of Mr N Ahmed v Capital Arches Group Limited EAT [2025] 133, in which the EAT considered an ET’s decision that claims were presented out of time and the refusal to extend time on the ‘just and equitable’ basis. In doing so, the EAT analyses the distinction between events that occur as one off events with ongoing consequences and conduct extending over a period. This judgment will be of particular...
Continue reading
