3PB construction barrister James Davison writes for Construction Law magazine
8th August 2019
3PB's James DavisonJames DavisonCall: 1996 has written a piece for July's edition of Construction Law magazine alongside Anne Wright of Lawrence Stephens.
The article provides practical guidance on selecting an expert witness, and advises witnesses how to behave once appointed.
Related News
-
15th December 2025
Paul Newman to speak at UKA Annual Adjudication Conference 2025
3PB Barristers’ (3 Paper Buildings) specialist construction law barrister, mediator and arbitrator Paul Newman is set to speak at this year’s UKA Annual Adjudication Conference, taking place in London later this week (Wednesday 17 December 2025). The full-day conference brings together professionals from across the industry to offer insight into important topics surrounding construction and engineering adjudication. Paul will be joining an esteemed panel of experts, including panel moderator Ryan Turner (Atkin Chambers), Charles Brown...
Continue reading -
3PB Barristers (3 Paper Buildings) have been awarded a record number of individual rankings in the 2026 edition of Chambers and Partners, reaching a total of 104 (96 last year) achieved by 86 of its barristers. The national set has doubled its number of individual rankings in 5 years (52 in 2021) and is rewarded with accolades in 22 areas of law across the London Bar as well as in the North Eastern, South Eastern,...
Continue reading -
18th November 2025
Rob Dawson successfully challenges the Court’s jurisdiction to hear an application under s.68 of the Arbitration Act 1996
3PB Barristers’ (3 Paper Buildings) commercial and construction barrister Rob Dawson appeared for the Defendants in a recent case in the High Court (Technology and Construction Court). The Defendants successfully obtained an arbitration award in their favour and were represented in that arbitration by 3PB’s Dr Zhen Ye. The Claimant sought to challenge the arbitration award under s.68 of the Arbitration Act 1996. The central issue before the Court was whether the Claimant was entitled...
Continue reading