3PB Family Barrister Emma Harman explains the lessons that can be learned from A Local Authority v G (Parent with Learning Disability)  EWFC B94.View Publication
Jennifer Kotilaine, 3PB family barrister, reflects on the various ways in which the application of children law has adapted to the internet and social media and on the further adaptations that may lie ahead.View Publication
Read Hamish Dunlop's lecture notes on Owens v Owens, a groundbreaking divorce case scheduled to go to the Supreme Court. Hamish's analysis explains why this case could lead to the introduction of no-fault divorce in the UK.View Publication
3PB Family Barrister Rachael Goodall analyses the Court of Appeal's judgement in the appeal of JS v RS  EWCA Civ 408, concerning the division of matrimonial assets following the dissolution of a marriage.
Rachael's analysis takes account of the jurisprudential relationship between Miller v Miller and McFarlane v McFarlane.View Publication
Steven Howard writes commentary on case of parents acquitted of child abuseView Publication
Evidence and interim care orders. Discussing the judgment in Re NL, Katherine Dunseath predicts that the increasing push for transparency within the family justice system will result in the evidence of local authorities being subject to ever-increasing scrutiny by the court. Interview with Lexis Nexis.View Publication
Richard Harrison QC and Katherine Dunseath advise that the judgment in LM v DR emphasises the duties of those who pursue without notice applications. LM v DR  EWHC 1943 (Fam) Interview with Lexis Nexis.View Publication
Katherine Dunseath and Frank Feehan QC discuss the Court of Appeal's judgment in Mills v Mills, which highlights the financial ties afforded by joint lives maintenance payment. Katherine Dunseath, a barrister at 3PB Barristers, and Frank Feehan QC analyse how the Court of Appeal approached a cross-application for an upward variation of a joint lives maintenance order taking into account financial decisions made by a divorcing spouse over a 15 year period.
They discuss the Court of Appeal's judgment in Mills v Mills, which highlights the financial ties afforded by joint lives maintenance payment.View Publication
English court exercises jurisdiction in retrospective leave to remove case (re X, Y and Z) – a Lexis Nexis interview by 3PB Family Barrister Katherine Dunseath and Ellis Jones' Katie Taft. Katherine Dunseath, a barrister at 3PB Barristers, and Katie Taft, a senior associate at Ellis Jones Solicitors, discuss a novel family case involving important issues of delay and settlement.
Katherine Dunseath (Call 2008) has a thriving practice advising on all aspects of family law. She regularly appears in the High Court and has appeared in the Court of Appeal on numerous occasions.
** This article was first published on Lexis®PSL. Family analysis on 25 October 2016. Click for a free trial of Lexis®PSL.View Publication
3PB Family Barrister Nicola Frost provides an insightful summary of Re: MM (A patient)  EWCA Civ 34, an appeal from the Court of Protection in which the appellant had been ordered to facilitate MM's return to this jurisdiction, the court having found (on a number of occasions) it to be in MM's best welfare interests to be cared for in the south west of England.
The parties compromised the appeal and the court was asked to approve a consent order, allowing the appeal, on the basis that (i) the order made had become otiose and (ii) it would be futile to subject the appellant to further coercive orders in the face of her continuing obduracy. Case remitted to the court of first instance for the proceedings to be concluded.View Publication