Administration and Public Law
Sibghat Kadri QC has an exceptional caseload and expertise in immigration and family law disputes with public authorities. The very first immigration case he conducted was a challenge to the powers of the UK Secretary of State to remove illegal immigrants under the Immigration Act 1971, namely Azam  2 All ER and  AC18. This early case of his was swiftly followed by another well-known case, Phansopkar , which has been the subject of much academic discussion. He also conducted the very first case before the Special Immigration Appeal Commission.
His family and immigration law practices overlap because cases often involve recognition of foreign marriages and divorce. Sibghat has conducted several cases involving Muslim sharia law, particularly the recognition of foreign Muslim marriage and talaq (divorce). Many of these cases have had a direct impact on immigration law. One such case was Ghulam Fatima  QB 190,  AC 527 in which Sabghat appeared in the House of Lords.
- Supawan v Secretary of State for the Home Department  EWHC 2918 (Admin)
- AA (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for Home Department  EWCA Civ 1249,  Imm AR 496
- B&Anor, R (on the application of ) v Secretary of State Home for the Home Department & Anor  EWCA Civ 854
- Ahmed v Secretary of State for the Home Department  EWCA Civ 988,  1 WLR 593
- Bibi&Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department  EWHC 3685
- AN (Afghanistan) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department  EWCA Civ 1189
- Mohamed v Secretary of State for the Home Department  EWCA Civ 331
- Secretary of State for the Home Department v Rehman  UKHL 47
Sibghat Kadri QC's earlier immigration cases include:
- Ex parte Azam  AC 18
- Ex parte Moghal , QB 313
- Ex parte Phansopkar  QB 606
- Ex parte Khan v SOS  1WLR 1466
- Ex parte Iqbal  143 JP 248
- Ex parte Mahmood  QB 58
- Ex parte Khwaja  AC 74
- Ghulam Yasin  Imm AR 62
- R v SOS and Lord Chancellor Ex parte Rehman  EWCA Civ 1613.
In the case of Ex parte Khan & others  2 All ER, Sibghat successfully challenged the power of the Secretary of State (SOS) to detain an asylum seeker pending deportation. The Court of Appeal however allowed the appeal by the SOS in this instance.
Another leading case was Patel, Ahmed, Hussain and others  EWHC Admin 45, INR 57. in which Sibghat led Mr Arthur Blake in respect of six appellants in the Court of Appeal. This was the first case which held that a treaty which was not part of domestic law had a greater effect in relation to the exercise of discretion under the prerogative than it does in the case of statutory discretion.
Public law cases
Sibghat has regularly appeared in public law cases for members of the public against local authorities, including acting in the reported cases of:
- Akumah v Hackney Borough Council  UKHL 17
- Satu v Hackney Borough Council  All ER 86
- Oyeyi-Efflong &Anor v R (on the application of) The Bridge NDC Seven Sisters Partnership  EWHC 606
In 2015 Sibghat conducted a long case in the Chancery Division involving a dispute between the trustees and congregation of a mosque in the Midlands, namely:
- Rehman & Anor v Ali & Ors  EWHC 4056 (CH)
“Whether opposing Martial Law in Pakistan or fighting racism at the bar, Sibghat Kadri has spent a lifetime battle against injustices”
Law Society Gazette
“Sibghat Kadri QC was a leading authority on immigration and race relations well before there were books and case law in these areas of law”
Black Lawyers Directory (BLD)
Professional qualifications & appointments
Bencher of the Inner Temple : since 1997
Member of the Race Relations Committee of the Bar : 1983-85 and 1988-89
Society of Asian Lawyers UK : Lifetime Achievement Award
Member of the Pakistani Bar
Sibghat Kadri QC is qualified to accept instructions directly from members of the public and professional clients under the Direct Public Access scheme.More Information