Nick Robinson’s client found not guilty of assault; highlighting the importance of the Section 28 Procedure
15th March 2022
The case centred on whether the defendant committed a serious sexual assault against his 5-year old niece. The defendant denied the allegation and contended that his niece was either mistaken or wrongly attributing to him the behaviour of another family member.
The case involved sensitive third party disclosure and an application pursuant to section 41 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. The social services records indicated previous reports by the complainant to her parents and a social worker relating to similar sexual activity with someone other than the defendant and in analogous circumstances. Nick made an application to ask the complainant questions about this evidence, which the Judge granted.
The complainant was cross-examined at a hearing pursuant to section 28 Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. Therefore, she was questioned over 7 months before the main trial and her evidence was video recorded. As a result of the complainant's answers to Nick’s questions the prosecution conducted a review of the case and the police made further enquiries. Ultimately, the prosecution offered no evidence. This case illustrates the practical advantages of the section 28 procedure.
An added layer of complexity in this case arose from the defendant's severe autism and learning disabilities. This necessitated the instruction of a psychiatrist, psychologist and an intermediary as well as consideration of the defendant’s fitness to plead and stand trial.
The trial was held at Oxford Crown Court before HHJ Maria Lamb. Nick was instructed by Kevin Bourne of Hurleys Solicitors.
Related Articles
-
3PB's crime and regulatory barrister Nicholas Cotter (pictured here), led by Mark Wyeth KC, has just completed a three-month trial at the Central Criminal Court in which his client was acquitted of conspiracy to murder The client was alleged to be involved in a gangland shooting in a nightclub, which was indicted at the outset as a conspiracy to murder. Following trial, the client was found guilty of a firearms offence but acquitted of all...
Continue reading -
3PB's crime and regulatory barrister Jonathan Underhill’s client CW was charged with a serious allegation of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm (GBH) following a violent incident inside his own home in 2021. CW raised, and maintained, self-defence at trial. Over the course of careful and decisive cross examination, the complainant admitted not having told the complete truth to the police; accepting that he had failed to mention his own consumption of Class...
Continue reading -
3PB's criminal defence barrister Nick Robinson's client AO was charged with Attempted Murder following an altercation in which he stabbed a fellow Afghan national twice. At the time AO was aged 17 years, and suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder due to his experiences in Afghanistan. The case had international ramifications as the defendant, who had been trafficked to the UK, fled to Europe after the offence, and was arrested and interviewed in Salzburg before being...
Continue reading -
Four 3PB barristers secure acquittals for two defendants in major Conspiracy to Supply cocaine trial
Four 3PB criminal law barristers - Nick Robinson, Tom Evans, David Jenkins and Oliver Hirsch (pictured top left to bottom right) - have successfully defended two clients in a major Conspiracy to Supply Class A drugs trial, following Operation Krill which was an extensive surveillance operation lasting more than a year. Three individuals were charged with Conspiracy to Supply cocaine and two stood trial in December 2023. AD was alleged to have been the head...
Continue reading
